Six Sigma Model is defined as a fairly new management strategy that organizations have started applying to their processes to improve performance with the core objective being cost reduction, product improvement, meeting customer expectations, and increasing revenue. This initiative applies a systematic result-oriented methodology that is tailor-made for businesses to achieve improvements in process variation, yield, and cycle time (Magnusson et al. 2003). This systematic process makes use of managerial and statistical tools to achieve continuous improvement of organizational processes. It is perhaps noteworthy that organizations often apply Six Sigma when they experience performance gaps in processes that have the potential to have a negative impact on their financial goals or its customers (Shankar, 2009).
This is the second part of a case study titled “The Application of Six Sigma Methodology in Total Quality Management. A Case Study of Amazon” The introductory part of the paper can be accessed by clicking the link provided towards the end of this page.
The Six Sigma Model of Total Quality Management-TQM
The term “Sigma” is derived from the Greek letter symbol σ, which denotes the standard deviation of a random variable (McAdam et al., 2004). Thus, “sigma processes” stems from the understanding that if there exists standard deviations between the processes nearest specification limit and the mean, practically no items will fail to meet specifications (Kwak et al., 2006). In this regard, upon sampling of large sets of data or over a certain period of time, it is anticipated that about 68.26% of the data will fall within the first standard deviation markers above and below the mean (Tennant, 2002). There exists a 95.44% probability that the same value falls within two standard deviations from the mean, while 99.73% of the data will be covered at three standard deviation levels above and below the mean. Finally 99.994% will fall within four sigma ranges from the mean. This concept is illustrated in Fig. I below.

Based on these findings, there exists a strong assurance of acceptable products provided that the process is centred on the target value of being within a range of acceptability; at or outside the four sigma point on the standard deviation distribution curve (Harry et al., 2000). It is worth noting that whereas organizations can reduce product variation by adjusting certain control factors, there still exists a tendency for processes to drift approximately 1.5 sigma levels on either side of the centre point due to natural, unavoidable sources of variation in processes, components, and materials over time. Therefore, upon factoring this effect of process drift, the true probability of a process with range of acceptability at four-sigma range producing products of acceptable quality actually becomes 98.76% rather than 99.994% (Tennant, 2002).
Therefore, the process capability curve must fit within the range of acceptability, that is, at or beyond six standard deviations in order to reach near-perfect process output. As a quality management metric, the Six Sigma can be used to reduce process output variations to near zero-defects such that it will produce a yield of 99.99966%, which results in a tightening defect rate target of acceptable limits at 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO) or less (Brocke et al., 2010).
DMAIC Tool Kit Framework
The DMAIC roadmap is at the heart of the Six Sigma methodology. DMAIC is an acronym that describes the five phases of Six Sigma implementation process. The letters in the acronym stand for Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, and Control (Shankar, 2009). It is noteworthy that each of the different steps throughout the process is required so as to ensure that the organization is correctly applying the Six Sigma principles for best outcome.
Originally when Motorola developed the methodology, it had only included four steps within the process, that is, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control. However a fifth phase was introduced by General Electric thus the acronym DMAIC (Eckes, 2000). The DMAIC toolkit was expected to provide a closed-loop process that eliminated unnecessary or unproductive steps to the production process so as to ensure there is continuous improvement in production.
Define
The purpose of this phase is to set up the production process for success and to provide the project team ample time to complete their analysis of what the project should accomplish. It is at this stage where the project managers agree on existing problems and then assess how current processes fail to meet customers’ needs through Critical-To-Quality (CTQ) or Voice of the Customer.
Measure
At this phase, managers measure key aspects of data arising from the product due to production processes. The project team performs the following duties: –
- Identifying and operationalizing key metrics
- Developing a data collection plan
- Conducting a measurement system analysis that helps in verification of data
- Stratifying data
- Establishing baseline charts
- Making charts and graphs that aid in the understanding of the process thus making it easy to identify errors, processing times, and defects.
Analyse
At this phase, project teams work towards understanding the root causes of the problem. Thus, they gather clues for improvement through first analysing processes to identify gaps using statistical analysis, value-added analysis, or a fishbone charts. Once they are through with the data gathering process, they will begin a verification process to pinpoint the actual causes of the problem.
Improve
At this phase, the team is now ready to improve the performance of processes and remove the causes of defect through applying new innovative ideas. The project team could first develop and test a number of solutions through piloting or experimenting techniques. The key deliverable at this stage of the process is verifiable improvement through measurement.
Control
The purpose of this phase is to ensure that implementation of the recommendations runs smoothly and that sustained improvement in processes is realized. The results obtained from the improved process will be flowcharted and compared with results from previous old methods before they can be approved as the new standard operation procedure. The project team will continue to track results so as to prevent any “drift” back to previous results. Therefore, they will continue to be proactive in monitoring and addressing any new concerns in processes as part of a long-term process control.
Overview of Amazon.Com
Since its inception in 1994, Amazon has expanded from being a bookstore to being the largest online retailer in the world. In 2017, the company had a customer base of over 30 million people (Sharma, 2017). As of 2020, Amazon was considered the world’s largest online marketplace in the world with an estimated annual revenue of over $280 billion revenue. According to Hallam (2014), much of this success can be attributed to the fact that the company did not just limit itself to doing classical e-retailing but also developed innovative services like Amazon FireTV (a subscription based web TV based system), Amazon Fresh (an express delivery service that provides customers with access to fresh produce/groceries), Amazon Phone, and the Amazon Web Services (cloud services). These new developments have made Amazon an innovative developer and retailer.
Perhaps the core element that has been driving much of this innovation and success is the company’s customer-centric approach to doing business. Additionally, although the Six Sigma approach is rarely mentioned in its reports, the methodology is entrenched in the company culture. In fact, the company is now seen as a perfect example of the power of integrating the Six Sigma approach to company processes (Sharma, 2017).
Application of the Six Sigma Methodology in Amazon
Much of Amazon’s success began in the year 1999 when the company brought in Jeff Wilke, who had a background in applying the Six Sigma methodology, as Vice President of Operations (Sharma, 2017). At the core of Amazon’s decision to incorporate Six Sigma into its processes is the fact that it wanted to gain a competitive advantage over its competitors. In this regard, the company aimed to:-
- Converge Interactivity- Amazon aimed to create an intuitive marketplace for its customers by making it social and interactive with its client base. This way, the company hoped to capture the unique individuality aspects of its clients through personalizing their shopping based on their unique preferences.
- Provide customers with options and respond to fluctuating market conditions: – The firm wanted to give its customers access to a wide range of options to choose from thus giving them the option to choose one product over the other and at the lowest possible price.
- Respect time and space interdependency- The Company strived to make its services available to its customers all of the time and across the globe (Paris, 2014). In addition, Amazon strived to deliver products to its customers as quickly as possible and at the lowest cost.
Amazon has over the years continued to incorporate the Six Sigma methodology in its operations as a way of managing its processes. It has done so by implementing the following into its strategy: –
- Operational Excellence– the Six Sigma methodology has over time become deeply rooted in the company’s culture. It is estimated that around 2000 orders are made every minute via the company’s website (Sharma, 2017). Hence, it is absolutely crucial that the firm maintains high operational standards in its processes in order for it to meet its client demands. The firm has continued to define operational excellence through conscious improvement to customer experience processes to drive up customer satisfaction and, secondly, driving efficiency, and productivity across the firm.
- Revising its Staffing and Training Policy – Today, Amazon only hires the best and the brightest candidates and trains its employees on the Six Sigma methodology as part of its processes improvement initiative.
- Directly applying Six Sigma methods to its processes – The Company has employed a number of tools such as Root Cause Analysis and DMAIC to reduce variation in its processes. Additionally, the firm has continued to cultivate a Kaizen-based company culture to eliminate non-value adding process stages thus reducing wastage.
Other Critical Success Factors (CSFs) Employed by Amazon
There exists a number of other Critical Success Factors that Amazon has employed in its processes as part of its efforts to increase efficiency, improve inventory management, and have a stronger value stream control.
Top-down Managerial Commitment
In order to leverage the full potential of Six Sigma, Amazon has incorporated the Six Sigma methodology as an integral part of its overall business strategy. Therefore, its actions have manifested into pragmatic action supported by management thus its ambitious Six Sigma programs have had a higher chance of survival (Laguna et al., 2004). As a result, its top-down managerial involvement has become crucial in influencing the attitudes of employees towards quality. However, it is noteworthy, that although top-level management is not always directly involved in active in the day-to-day improvement of the firm’s projects; their role as leaders, project sponsors and advocates has had the ability to drive quality initiatives into every corner of the firm for its successful execution of Six Sigma projects in the long-run
Culture Change
Based on the observation made by Tennant (2002), Six Sigma has the ability to affect the entire organization upon its implementation, bringing about a transition from current cultural traits and attributes to a new and different set of values and perspectives. As culture and values are deep-seated and may not always be visible, organizations must be aware of the challenges created when people become defiant to changes introduced by Six Sigma (Brue, 2005). In order to overcome such resistance, Amazon has devised a clear communication plan and effective channels to motivate individuals by educating all staff members on company processes and the benefits of applying Six Sigma (Kwak et al., 2006).
Training
Amazon has continued to create comprehensive and formalized training programs for its employees with a special focus on understanding the statistical tools used for data analysis, process performance, the DMAIC improvement methodology, project management, quality function deployment as well as the overall Six Sigma framework. This initiative was based off the understanding that in order for Six Sigma to succeed, knowledge should be diffused throughout the entire organization so that managers and employees can effectively apply and implement Six Sigma techniques effectively (Kwak et al., 2006). A unique feature of Amazon’s Six Sigma educational programs is its martial-arts inspired Black Belt certification program that provides training which includes hands-on improvement projects.
Customer Centricity
Amazon has over the years paid a close attention to its customers by not only providing them with a wide range of product options on their platform but also responding to their requests promptly. Six Sigma necessitates formal understanding of customers, whether it is the ultimate customer or the many touch-point customer/supplier relationships within business processes. Customer centricity can be achieved by understanding what the customer requirements are (spoken and unspoken) as well as the gaps between current and desired performance which are defined by data and facts, baseline and goal performance criteria combined with Six Sigma tools to quantify the criteria (Burton et al., 2005). It is unlikely that customers will have a detailed understanding of the overall sigma level of the organization’s processes and products. However, clients care about the product offering based on what they intend to do with the product, or that the services they require will match up to their expectations (Goh, 2002).
Measurement System
The key purpose of Six Sigma is to base decisions on the collection of factual data and to quantify the effects of implemented improvements therefore the establishment of an adequate performance measurement system to collect relevant data that is of significant importance (Laguna et al., 2004). Often the difficulty lies in measurement variability as not all measurements can come out with exact results each time. It is important to understand the extent and causes of such variability to assess if the measurement system is satisfactory in order to achieve stability, repeatability, reproducibility, adequate measurement units, good linearity and consistency of the variance while minimizing bias in the measurement of Six Sigma projects (Joglekar, 2003). Amazon has over time maintained a measurement system that helps it base its decisions on issues that will affect its processes.
Functional Management Support
According to Brink et al. (2008), relationship marketing is a crucial CSF relating to functional management support, which assists in building, developing and preserving effective relationships with customers. In the context of services, relationships is particularly important because it is the means to which customers are retained by forming strong associations that improve customer loyalty (Shajahan, 2006; Berndt et al., 2004). As a result Amazon has continued to embrace relationship marketing as a factor to attain long-term success in future.
Selection of New Projects
Amazon has continued to be selective of the projects that it intends to undertake often prioritizing the right markets as well as target audiences and making exact deals for deriving positive outcomes. These actions have had a dramatic improvement on the company’s performance as now evidenced by its financial success
Leadership Practices
Amazon has continued to optimize its existing operational or business arrangements and adopting holistic approach for promoting innovativeness. Therefore, this has led to an increase in its level of adaptability as well as responsiveness thus raising customer satisfaction level and at the same time loyalty by a considerable extent.
Clear Project Goals
Amazon has been able to attain long-term success by ensuring performance enhancement throughout several business functions and most vitally managing excessive level of costs along with making effective pricing decisions. Additionally, the firm has continued to perform other crucial activities such as ethical sourcing, complying with strict regulatory norms and meeting high standards. These project goals have had an impact in helping the retailer meet all its project goals.
Impact of the Six Sigma Methodology on Amazon’s Success
The Six Sigma Approach has had considerable impact on the success of the online retailer. The company has grown from being just an online bookstore at the start of the millennium to being a tech giant. The following are some of the impacts of this methodology on the company: –
Amazon’s Increased Revenue
Amazon’s revenues have continued to grow over the years especially with the introduction of new products. The company revenues have been growing year over year to over 280 billion (Amazon, 2020). Even with the onset of the Corona Virus pandemic, the company has still been making money. According to the company’s financials: -Its revenue for Q1 was $75.452B marking a 26.39%increase year-over-year (Amazon, 2020).
Figure 2: Amazon’s revenue growth from 2006-2020. (Source: Macrotrends.com, 2020)
Much of this increase was attributed to a larger online marketplace presence as more people stayed at home and preferred online shopping to avoid corona virus infection. The usage of its web services, Amazon Web Services (AWS) also saw an increase as people and organizations began using their cloud-based services at a wider scale.
Amazon Stock Price
Amazon’s stock has continued to beat expectations over the years. In the past 5 years alone, the company’s stock price has climbed more than 500% (Sun, 2020). The company’s stock price performance has continued to outperform the market and it continues to make fresh highs every year. Analysts have predicted an even more expensive stock price if the company’s performance continues to beat expectations.
Figure 3: Amazon’s stock chart from 1997-2020. (Source: macrotrends.net, 2020)
5.0 Conclusion and Recommendations
The Six Sigma methodology approach continues to help management in process improvement and paying greater focus to the customer. The methodology has helped companies manage the ever-changing needs of customers. For Amazon, this approach has not only allowed it win more customers, but also maintain strong client loyalty amongst its customers. The future of Amazon continues to look bright especially with changing times in response to the coronavirus pandemic which has since led people and organizations adhere strictly social distance to guidelines and have since began using e-based platforms to perform their everyday tasks. One thing is certain, therefore, that the six sigma methodology will remain relevant for the years to come and will provide a sense of confidence to companies that they are doing all they can to meet customer demands.
Firms ought to apply the six sigma approach to help them align their corporate strategy with operational processes. The application of this methodology will not only help them meet their targets but will also see to it that they address quality concerns and variations in their processes. In the long-term, this will help them win more customers and evoke a strong sense of loyalty. It is also expected that this strong customer base will translate into additional revenue that the company may put to good use to expand their businesses.
Read the introductory part of “The Application of Six Sigma Methodology in Total Quality Management. A Case Study of Amazon” on total quality management.
References
Brocke, J. and Roseman, M. (2010). Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer.
Berndt, A. and Brink, A. (2004). Customer Relationship Management and Customer Service. US: Juta and Company Ltd.
Brue, G. (2005). Six Sigma for Small Business. 1st ed. Wisconsin: Entrepreneur Press.
Burton, T. and Sams, J. (2005). Six Sigma for Small and Mid-sized Organizations: Success through Scalable Deployment. 1st ed. Boca Raton: J Ross Publications.
Eckes, G. (2000). General Electric’s Six Sigma Revolution: How General Electric and Others Turned Process Into Profits. 1st Ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Goh, T. (2002). A Strategic Assessment of Six Sigma. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 18(1), pp.403-410.
Harry, M. (2000). Six Sigma: A Breakthrough Strategy for Probability. Quality Progress, (May), pp.60-64.
Hallam(2014). Amazon’s Business Strategy: 6 New Developments retrieved
19.11.2014 from http://www.hallaminternet.com/2014/amazons-business-strategynew-developments/
Joglekar, A. (2003). Statistical Methods for Six Sigma: In R&D and Manufacturing. 1st ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
Karapetrovic, S., & Jonker, J. (2003). Integration of standardized management systems: searching for a recipe and ingredients. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 14(4), 451-459
Kwak, Y. and Anbari, F. (2006). Benefits, obstacles and future of Six Sigma Approach. Technovation, 26(1), pp.708-715.
Laguna, M. and Marklund, J. (2004). Business Process Modelling, Simulation and Design. 1st Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Macrotrends (2020). “Amazon-23 year stock price history.” Retrieved from: https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/stock-price-history
Macrotrends (2020). Amazon Revenue 2006-2020. Retrieved from https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/revenue
Magnusson, K., Kroslid, D. and Bergman, B. (2003). Six Sigma: The Pragmatic Approach. 1st ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
McAdam, R. and Lafferty, B. (2004). A Multilevel Case Study Critique Of Six Sigma; Statistical Control Or Strategic Change.International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(5), pp.530-549.
Mukherjee P.N. (2006). Total Quality Management. New Delhi: Prentice Hall
Oakland, J. S. (2003). Total Quality Management: Text with Cases (Vol. 3rd ed). Oxford:
Taylor & Francis
Paris, C (2014). Amazon vs. Ebay – Which Site Is Best For Selling Used Goods?
Retrieved from https://www.udemy.com/blog/amazon-vs-ebay/
Poornima M. (2009). Total Quality Management. Dorlin Kindersley, India: Pearson
Education.
Sharma, P. (2017). Six Sigma-A Case Study of Amazon.Com. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 7, 8.
Shewhart, W.A. (1980). Economic control of quality of manufactured product. New York: ASQC Quality Press
Shajahan, S. (2006). Relationship Marketing: Text and Cases. US: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Shankar, R. (2009). Process Improvement Using Six Sigma: A DMAIC Guide. US: ASQ Quality Press.
Slack, S. C. (2010). Operations Management. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Sun, L. (2020). “Up 500% in 5 Years, How Much Higher Can Amazon’s Stock Soar?” Retrieved from: https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/04/25/up-500-in-5-years-how-much-higher-can-amazon-stock.aspx
Tennant, G. (2002). Design for Six Sigma: Launching New Products and Services Without Failure. 1st ed. Hampshire: Gower Publishing Limited.
Wheeler, D. (1993). Understanding variation: The key to managing chaos. Knoxville: SPC
Leave a Reply